The Blackwell Pincer: AI CapEx Cycles Drive Tech Gains and Macro Dislocation

The CapEx Lock-In: How Blackwell’s Physical Bottlenecks are Rewiring Macro Flows

The 4-Layer Cascading Impact Chain

[Layer 1: Direct Impacts]
NVDA Blackwell Demand Guidance ──> Surging Upstream Demand (TSM, ASML) ──> Hyperscaler CapEx Lock-In (MSFT, GOOGL)
                                                                                  │
                                                                                  ▼
[Layer 2: Secondary Effects]
Data Center Power Grid Squeeze ──> CoWoS Advanced Packaging Bottlenecks ──> Legacy Semi Cannibalization (TXN)
                                                                                  │
                                                                                  ▼
[Layer 3: Macro Propagation]
Corporate Debt Issuance Spikes ──> Long-Duration Yields Rise (TLT) ──> Commodity-Currency & Gold Safe-Haven Bids
                                                                                  │
                                                                                  ▼
[Layer 4: Non-Obvious Cross-Connections]
- Hyperscaler Margin-Yield Negative Feedback Loop (Tech-Bond Correlation Break)
- Physical Bottleneck Substitution (UNG & COPX Outperform Debt-Saddled XLU)
- EDA Software (SNPS, CDNS) as a Structural Hedge Against Physical CoWoS Bottlenecks
- Legacy Semi Cannibalization Timing Cascade to High-Yield Credit Spreads (HYG)

Major Events & Direct Impacts (Layer 1)

The immediate focal point of the equity market is the upcoming Q2 2026 guidance and earnings cycle, where Nvidia's Blackwell demand projections are being measured against highly elevated consensus expectations.

• Valuation Volatility & Concentration Risk: Nvidia (NVDA) closed today at $225.44 (+2.19%), recovering from intraday lows of $220.50. Despite the constructive price action, the concentration risk within the technology sector has reached acute levels. The Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) rose +1.89% to close at $176.52, driven almost entirely by the market-cap-weighted strength of NVDA, MSFT, and Apple.
• Upstream Supply Chain Correlation: The demand signal for Blackwell has established a direct, positive correlation with semiconductor manufacturing equipment giants (ASML, AMAT, LRCX, KLAC) and advanced foundry capacity. TSM closed up +2.45% at $402.22, reflecting its monopolistic control over the manufacturing of Blackwell's complex multi-die architecture.
• The Hyperscaler Divergence: While hardware providers are capturing immediate upside, the buyers of these chips—the hyperscalers—are showing signs of relative weakness. Microsoft (MSFT) slipped -0.13% to close at $416.88, while Alphabet (GOOGL) fell -0.83% to $384.43. This divergence reflects growing market concern over the immediate monetization of these massive capital outlays relative to the high cost of the physical hardware.

Secondary Effects & Sector Rotation (Layer 2)

As Blackwell chips are shipped and deployed, the secondary effects are reshaping supply chains and capital allocation across adjacent sectors.

• The Data Center Power Squeeze: Blackwell’s high thermal design power (TDP) per rack is driving an exponential increase in data center electricity requirements. This has triggered a massive capital buildout in power infrastructure. However, instead of benefiting traditional utilities (XLU) equally, it is creating a divergence. Utilities are facing long regulatory lead times to upgrade the grid, while hyperscalers are increasingly looking to bypass the grid entirely.
• Advanced Packaging Bottlenecks: Blackwell's multi-die architecture relies heavily on TSM’s Chip-on-Wafer-on-Substrate (CoWoS) advanced packaging. CoWoS capacity remains the primary physical bottleneck in the AI supply chain. This bottleneck gives TSM immense pricing power, allowing it to raise Average Selling Prices (ASPs) for packaging services, which directly pressures the gross margins of fabless chip designers like Nvidia and Broadcom (AVGO).
• Legacy Capital Cannibalization: To fund these massive AI infrastructure budgets, enterprise and cloud customers are actively cannibalizing their legacy, automotive, and industrial analog semiconductor budgets. Companies like Texas Instruments (TXN), Microchip Technology (CHP), and Analog Devices (ADI) are experiencing prolonged inventory digestion and delayed demand recovery as a result.

Macro Propagation & Cross-Asset Flows (Layer 3)

The scale of the AI infrastructure buildout has grown so massive that it is now acting as a primary driver of global macro variables, affecting bond yields, commodity prices, and currency alignments.

• Corporate Debt and Treasury Yields: The unprecedented capital expenditures required for Blackwell deployments are forcing hyperscalers to draw down cash reserves and issue substantial volumes of corporate debt. This surge in high-grade corporate issuance, combined with heavy utility debt issuance for grid upgrades, is competing directly with US Treasuries. This dynamic is putting upward pressure on long-duration yields and dragging down the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT), which closed at $83.91, despite a minor +1.07% corrective bounce today.
• Commodity-Driven Inflationary Pressures: The physical infrastructure of AI—liquid cooling systems, heavy-duty power transformers, and grid connections—is highly copper-intensive. This structural demand is driving copper prices and the Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) higher. This physical demand acts as a structural inflation impulse, supporting Gold (GLD) and strengthening commodity-linked currencies like the Australian Dollar (FXA), even as the US Dollar Index (UUP) remains supported by safe-haven flows.
• Geopolitical Risk and Safe-Haven Convergence: Because Blackwell production is entirely dependent on TSM’s advanced packaging facilities in Taiwan, the global technology supply chain has never been more geographically concentrated. This extreme concentration has amplified the geopolitical risk premium. Any increase in cross-strait friction now triggers a non-traditional market response: Gold (GLD) and the US Dollar (UUP) surge simultaneously as safe havens, breaking their historical negative correlation, while global equities experience systemic liquidity drawdowns.

Non-Obvious Connections & Hidden Trades (Layer 4)

Beyond the direct and secondary effects lie the non-obvious cross-asset connections and feedback loops that are reshaping institutional portfolios.

1. The Hyperscaler Margin-Yield Negative Feedback Loop

Typically, mega-cap tech companies act as safe-haven "duration" assets when bond yields spike because of their massive cash balances. However, the current CapEx cycle has broken this relationship. To fund Blackwell procurement, hyperscalers are issuing massive corporate debt, which actively pushes long-duration yields (TLT) higher.

Simultaneously, this capital intensity drives up depreciation and operating expenses, compressing their own margins. Thus, their aggressive spending drives yields up while eroding their own profitability, triggering a dual, correlated sell-off in both tech equities (XLK) and long-duration bonds (TLT).

2. Physical Bottleneck Substitution (Natural Gas and Copper Outperformance)

While utilities (XLU) are the intuitive play for data center power demand, they are bogged down by long regulatory lead times and heavy debt-financing costs. To bypass these grid delays, hyperscalers are increasingly constructing "behind-the-meter" natural gas-fired generation assets directly adjacent to data centers.

This creates a high-conviction substitution trade: long natural gas (UNG) and copper-intensive cooling infrastructure (COPX) outperform utility equities (XLU), which are structurally weighed down by capital expenditure delays and financing costs.

[Hyperscaler Power Need] ──> Grid Upgrade Delays (XLU Lag) ──> Behind-the-Meter Natural Gas / Copper Cooling (UNG & COPX Outperform)

3. EDA Software as a Structural Hedge against Packaging Bottlenecks

If advanced packaging (CoWoS) bottlenecks limit TSM's physical delivery of Blackwell chips, Nvidia's near-term revenue growth will cap out. However, this physical constraint forces competitors (AMD, MRVL) and hyperscalers designing custom silicon to aggressively iterate their designs to optimize for alternative packaging architectures or smaller die sizes.

This R&D race drives inelastic demand for Electronic Design Automation (EDA) software and IP licensing. Consequently, Synopsys (SNPS) and Cadence Design Systems (CDNS) serve as highly resilient, asset-light hedges against physical hardware supply chain failures.

4. Legacy Semi Cannibalization Timing Cascade to High-Yield Spreads

The immediate capital rotation out of legacy analog semiconductors (TXN) into AI hardware is well-documented. However, the macro transmission mechanism has a longer fuse.

Over a 1-to-3-month horizon, the prolonged inventory digestion in legacy chips delays the recovery of industrial production (XLI). By month 6, highly leveraged industrial and automotive suppliers face cash flow crunches due to delayed product cycles, causing high-yield credit spreads (HYG) to widen. This demonstrates how an AI hardware spend surge can indirectly trigger high-yield credit distress.

5. The CapEx-Lock-In Liquidity Squeeze

If Nvidia's guidance misses consensus, it will trigger an immediate spike in tech implied volatility (UVXY) and a sharp correction in XLK. However, because hyperscalers have already committed to multi-year Blackwell procurement contracts and grid infrastructure investments, they cannot rapidly scale back capital expenditures or debt issuance.

This creates a structural mismatch: tech equity valuations collapse, but the supply of corporate and utility debt remains elevated, preventing TLT and LQD from acting as diversifiers and forcing a multi-asset risk-parity liquidation.

Security-by-Security Analysis

1. Nvidia (NVDA)

NVDA — Unified Synthesis

Executive Summary

NVDA is currently caught in a tug-of-war between strong technical momentum and emerging bearish exhaustion signals. Chart 2 — Delta + Technical provides a high-conviction bullish outlook driven by strong delta and EMA alignment, while Chart 1 — Signals + Liquidity warns of a bearish liquidity divergence and a pending short trigger at 217.03.

Consensus Verdict

Reason: The current bullish trend momentum (Chart 2) is directly contested by a latent bearish reversal setup and liquidity divergence (Chart 1).

Where the charts agree

• Both charts acknowledge the current strength of the move, with Chart 1 noting a 'Bullish uptrend' and Chart 2 reporting 'all 4 bullish' indicators aligned.

Where the charts disagree

• Directional conflict: Chart 1 is preparing for a SHORT entry with a trigger at 217.03, whereas Chart 2 maintains a high-conviction BULLISH bias.
• Momentum signals: Chart 2 shows bullish RSI momentum (63.09), while Chart 1 highlights a bearish divergence in liquidity.

Key Levels to Watch

• 223.16 — EMA 9 (Chart 2)
• 220.55 — EMA 21 (Chart 2)
• 217.03 — Short Trigger (Chart 1)

2. Microsoft (MSFT)

MSFT — Unified Synthesis

Executive Summary

MSFT is currently navigating a high-friction zone characterized by a conflict between bullish momentum and bearish structural indicators. While Chart 1 — Signals + Liquidity suggests a bullish reversal with rising liquidity and targets T1-T4 already booked, Chart 2 — Delta + Technical maintains a bearish stance due to negative delta and price trading below the 9 and 21 EMAs.

Consensus Verdict

Reason: The trade environment is highly ambiguous due to the direct contradiction between momentum-based bullishness and structural bearishness.

Where the charts agree

• Both charts indicate residual bullish momentum, with Chart 1 showing rising liquidity and Chart 2 reporting an RSI in the 50-70 zone.
• Price action is currently localized around a critical pivot zone, with Chart 1's key level (418.00) closely aligned with Chart 2's key level (417.32).

Where the charts disagree

• Direct contradiction on overall bias: Chart 1 — Signals + Liquidity is Bullish, while Chart 2 — Delta + Technical is Bearish.
• Trend interpretation conflict: Chart 1 — Signals + Liquidity identifies a 'Reversing' trend, whereas Chart 2 — Delta + Technical identifies a bearish EMA cross with price below both EMAs.
• Volume/Delta discrepancy: Chart 1 — Signals + Liquidity shows rising liquidity momentum, while Chart 2 — Delta + Technical reports net bearish delta with weak volume strength.

Key Levels to Watch

• 418.00 — Key Trigger Level (Chart 1)
• 417.32 — EMA 21 / Key Level (Chart 2)
• 416.25 — EMA 9 (Chart 2)
• 414.00 — Stop Loss (Chart 1)

3. Alphabet (GOOGL)

• Price: $384.43 (-0.83%)
• Day Range: $382.90 - $393.86
• Technical Levels: RSI(14) is neutral-positive at 59.5. The stock has pulled back from its recent high, trading below its 9-day EMA ($390.52) but remaining above its 20-day SMA ($380.90).
• Options Flow & Implied Volatility: Active trading in May 20 weekly options, with heavy volume on the $390 calls (Vol: 19,471, IV: 52.3%) and $387.5 calls (Vol: 16,256). Put volume was led by the $385 strike (Vol: 9,867).
• Causal Chain: GOOGL faces a similar margin squeeze to MSFT. The market is demanding evidence that its custom TPU program can offset the high cost of merchant Blackwell silicon, reducing its reliance on Nvidia and protecting its capital efficiency.

4. Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK)

• Price: $176.52 (+1.89%)
• Day Range: $173.95 - $177.25
• Technical Levels: RSI(14) is elevated at 69.26, rapidly approaching overbought territory. XLK is trading well above its 20-day SMA ($168.39) and is testing the upper Bollinger Band ($184.05).
• Options Flow & Implied Volatility: Put volume dominates the open interest, led by the May 22 $162 puts (Vol: 492, OI: 7,950, IV: 52.2%), indicating systematic hedging by portfolio managers against a broader tech sector correction.
• Causal Chain: XLK's high concentration in NVDA and MSFT makes it highly vulnerable to the CapEx-Lock-In Liquidity Squeeze. If NVDA's guidance disappoints, XLK faces a rapid de-grossing event.

5. Amazon (AMZN)

• Price: $264.58 (+2.02%)
• Day Range: $259.53 - $265.34
• Technical Levels: RSI(14) is neutral at 57.67. The stock is trading just below its 20-day SMA ($266.30) and above its 21-day EMA ($261.51).
• Options Flow & Implied Volatility: High call volume on the May 20 $262.5 strike (Vol: 45,297, IV: 43.1%) and the $265 strike (Vol: 43,179). Put volume is concentrated at the $260 strike (Vol: 14,592).
• Causal Chain: AWS is facing severe power availability constraints for its new data center builds. Delays in grid connectivity are forcing AMZN to invest heavily in alternative energy sourcing, increasing its capital intensity and pressuring free cash flow margins.

6. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSM)

TSM — Unified Synthesis

Executive Summary

The outlook for TSM is currently conflicted, sitting at a structural crossroads near the 397 level. While Chart 2 — Delta + Technical suggests bullish momentum with price trading above both EMA 9 and EMA 21 and accelerating MACD, Chart 1 — Signals + Liquidity remains bearish, awaiting a breakdown below the 397.04 trigger to initiate a short sequence.

Consensus Verdict

Reason: Technical momentum is bullish according to Chart 2, but this is countered by the pending bearish trigger and falling liquidity observed in Chart 1.

Where the charts agree

• Both charts identify the 395.95–397.04 zone as the critical pivot area for determining the next directional move.

Where the charts disagree

• Chart 2 — Delta + Technical signals bullish momentum via RSI and MACD, whereas Chart 1 — Signals + Liquidity maintains a bearish bias waiting for a breakdown.
• Chart 1 — Signals + Liquidity shows falling liquidity lines and neutral-amber momentum, contradicting the bullish trend alignment noted in Chart 2 — Delta + Technical.

Key Levels to Watch

• 397.04 — Short Trigger (Chart 1)
• 395.95 — EMA21 Support (Chart 2)
• 397.00 — EMA9 (Chart 2)
• 383.45 — T1 Target (Chart 1)

7. iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT)

TLT — Unified Synthesis

Executive Summary

TLT is currently transitioning from a completed bearish cycle into a period of directional uncertainty. While Chart 1 — Signals + Liquidity confirms that all primary short targets (T1-T5) have been successfully booked within a bearish downtrend, Chart 2 — Delta + Technical identifies emerging bullish momentum via MACD expansion and a bullish EMA cross, despite lingering negative volume-delta pressure.

Consensus Verdict

Reason: The primary bearish trend has exhausted its measured targets (Chart 1), creating a conflict between lingering bearish delta and new short-term bullish momentum indicators (Chart 2).

Where the charts agree

• Price exhaustion: Chart 1's completion of all short targets (T1-T5) aligns with Chart 2's reading of price near the lower envelope.
• Residual bearishness: Chart 1's bearish downtrend is supported by Chart 2's net bearish delta and bearish RSI momentum (30-50).

Where the charts disagree

• Momentum conflict: Chart 1 maintains a bearish bias based on trend, whereas Chart 2 shows bullish EMA crosses and expanding MACD histogram momentum.

Key Levels to Watch

• 87.67 — Stop/Resistance (Chart 1)
• 83.96 — Key Level (Chart 2)
• 83.06 — Current Price

8. Broadcom (AVGO)

• Price: $421.98 (+2.65%)
• Day Range: $411.42 - $424.17
• Technical Levels: RSI(14) is neutral at 56.3. AVGO is trading above its 20-day SMA ($420.01) and its 21-day EMA ($413.15).
• Options Flow & Implied Volatility: Heavy volume on May 20 $420 calls (Vol: 5,118, IV: 78.1%) and $410 puts (Vol: 1,978, IV: 91.0%).
• Causal Chain: As the leader in custom ASIC design and optical interconnects, AVGO is a direct beneficiary of hyperscaler custom silicon initiatives (such as Google's TPU and Meta's MTIA). However, it remains highly exposed to TSM packaging bottlenecks.

9. Meta Platforms (META)

• Price: $606.07 (+0.57%)
• Day Range: $597.81 - $608.00
• Technical Levels: RSI(14) is weak at 43.14, reflecting relative underperformance. The stock is trading below its 20-day SMA ($624.98) and its 9-day EMA ($611.09).
• Options Flow & Implied Volatility: Active trading in May 20 $602.5 calls (Vol: 15,999, IV: 44.0%) and $600 calls (Vol: 6,813, IV: 22.1%).
• Causal Chain: Meta’s open-source AI strategy (Llama) requires massive compute clusters but does not generate direct cloud subscription revenues. This increases its vulnerability to a CapEx-driven margin squeeze if ad revenues soften.

10. Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU)

• Price: $68.42 (-0.85%) [Derived from macro proxy pricing]
• Causal Chain: XLU is facing a dual headwind: rising long-duration yields (which make utility dividend yields less attractive) and massive capital expenditure requirements for grid upgrades. This forces heavy debt issuance, compressing equity returns relative to physical commodity plays.

11. Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX)

COPX — Unified Synthesis

Executive Summary

The short-term outlook for COPX has shifted toward a bearish posture. While Chart 1 — Signals + Liquidity notes a successful long trade with four targets already booked, it highlights a bearish liquidity crossover during the current pullback. This trend is heavily reinforced by Chart 2 — Delta + Technical, which reports high-conviction bearishness across the EMA, RSI, and MACD indicators.

Consensus Verdict

Reason: The successful realization of long targets in Chart 1 is currently being undermined by the high-conviction bearish technical confluence presented in Chart 2.

Where the charts agree

• Both charts identify immediate downward momentum: Chart 1 — Signals + Liquidity reports a bearish liquidity crossover, while Chart 2 — Delta + Technical shows all four technical indicators aligned bearishly.
• Current price action is interpreted as a reversal or pullback across both models.

Where the charts disagree

• Chart 1 — Signals + Liquidity maintains a bullish bias based on the success of the active long trade, whereas Chart 2 — Delta + Technical maintains a high-conviction bearish bias based on momentum indicators.

Key Levels to Watch

• 86.40 — T5 Target (Chart 1)
• 83.25 — EMA 9 (Chart 2)
• 79.43 — Stop Loss (Chart 1)

12. US Dollar Index (UUP)

• Price: $28.92 (+0.45%) [Derived from macro proxy pricing]
• Causal Chain: UUP is supported by safe-haven flows driven by geopolitical concentration risks in the Taiwan Strait, alongside high relative US interest rates fueled by persistent AI-driven structural inflation.

13. SPDR Gold Shares (GLD)

• Price: $221.50 (+1.25%) [Derived from macro proxy pricing]
• Causal Chain: GLD is experiencing a non-traditional safe-haven bid. It is rising alongside the US Dollar (UUP) as investors hedge against a potential supply chain disruption in Taiwan and structural inflation driven by data center commodity demand.

14. Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLI)

• Price: $122.10 (-0.95%) [Derived from macro proxy pricing]
• Causal Chain: XLI is lagging due to the legacy semiconductor cannibalization cascade. The delay in analog chip supply recovery is stalling industrial automation and automotive manufacturing cycles, weighing on industrial equities.

15. Texas Instruments (TXN)

• Price: $168.45 (-1.85%) [Derived from macro proxy pricing]
• Causal Chain: TXN is the epicenter of legacy semiconductor cannibalization. As capital is diverted to Blackwell, enterprise customers are running down existing analog inventory, delaying TXN’s revenue recovery and keeping its utilization rates low.

Historical Parallels

The 1999–2000 Telecom CapEx Bubble

During the late 1990s, telecom providers (such as WorldCom, Global Crossing, and Qwest) engaged in a massive land grab to lay fiber-optic cable and build internet infrastructure.

• The Parallel: Hardware providers like Cisco Systems and Lucent Technologies saw their valuations soar as they supplied the routers and switches for this buildout. The telecom providers loaded up on debt to fund this CapEx, assuming internet traffic would monetize fast enough to cover the interest and depreciation.
• The Outcome: When monetization lagged, the telecom carriers could no longer service their debt, leading to a systemic credit squeeze, widespread bankruptcies, and a prolonged collapse in hardware demand. Today's hyperscaler CapEx lock-in shares a similar structural setup, though today's buyers have significantly stronger balance sheets.

The 2021–2022 Supply Chain Bottlenecks

During the post-pandemic recovery, extreme logistics and semiconductor packaging bottlenecks broke traditional asset correlations.

• The Parallel: Physical constraints (shipping container shortages and legacy fab capacity limits) caused a decoupling between nominal demand and physical delivery.
• The Outcome: During the peak of the crisis, the traditional negative correlation between Gold and the US Dollar broke down; both rose simultaneously as safe havens and inflation hedges, while equity valuations contracted due to supply chain-induced margin compression. We are seeing an identical setup today, driven by CoWoS packaging bottlenecks.

Outlook & Risk Matrix

Short-Term Outlook (1–5 Days)

The market is highly coiled ahead of key hardware supply chain updates. Implied volatility (IV) in NVDA and its peers is elevated, reflecting a high-stakes environment.

• Bull Case: NVDA delivers guidance that exceeds the highest whisper numbers, accompanied by concrete commentary from TSM that CoWoS packaging bottlenecks are easing faster than expected. This would trigger a violent short-squeeze in XLK, pushing NVDA toward $235 and MSFT back above $425, while TLT stabilizes near $84.50.
• Bear Case: NVDA guidance merely matches consensus, or indicates that CoWoS bottlenecks will limit shipments through the end of 2026. This would trigger a sharp de-grossing event. NVDA would quickly retest its 20-day SMA ($213.50), while XLK would drop toward $168.
• Base Case: NVDA guides slightly above consensus, but highlights persistent packaging and power bottlenecks. Hardware names remain resilient but volatile, while hyperscalers (MSFT, GOOGL) continue to experience mild relative weakness due to margin concerns.

Medium-Term Outlook (1–4 Weeks)

Over the next month, the "CapEx-Lock-In Liquidity Squeeze" will likely become the dominant macro narrative. Even if tech equity valuations experience a correction, hyperscalers cannot easily scale back their capital commitments or debt issuance.

This persistent supply of corporate and utility debt will keep long-duration yields elevated, preventing TLT from acting as a traditional risk-off diversifier. In this environment, physical commodities (COPX, UNG) and asset-light design enablers (SNPS, CDNS) are poised to structurally outperform traditional utility and industrial equities.

What to Watch

1. NVDA Options Skew: Watch the May 22 weekly options. A continued rise in the implied volatility of the $180 and $190 puts relative to calls indicates that institutional players are paying a premium for downside protection.
2. TSM CoWoS Capacity Commentary: Any quantitative updates on CoWoS monthly wafer starts are critical. If TSM projects capacity to remain tight through late 2026, it will cap NVDA’s near-term volume growth while boosting the custom silicon R&D race, benefiting EDA software plays (SNPS, CDNS).
3. The TLT-XLK Correlation: Watch for days where both XLK and TLT sell off simultaneously. A persistent positive correlation in their sell-offs confirms that the Hyperscaler Margin-Yield Feedback Loop is active, signaling a broader multi-asset liquidity squeeze.
4. Behind-the-Meter Regulatory Approvals: Monitor any announcements from hyperscalers regarding direct partnerships with natural gas producers or on-site small modular nuclear reactor (SMR) developers. This will serve as a direct catalyst for the outperformance of UNG and COPX over XLU.

Education and market research only, not financial advice. Charts are OCS AI Trader readings at the time of writing and change with new bars.